Relaxed immigration rules for overseas care workers will have “little or no effect” because most UK employers do not pay these workers enough to qualify for the scheme, Evening Standard reports.
This is the warning from a care charity after new immigration rules came into force on February 15 allowing social care providers to recruit overseas workers to fill the significant number of vacancies that the sector is beset with.
Eligible workers will now be able to apply to come to the UK with their dependants - including partners and children - under the health and care visa, which offers a path to settlement.
To qualify, carers will reportedly need to earn an annual salary minimum of £20,480; equivalent to £10.10 an hour.
This is more than the £9.50 National Living Wage due to come into force in April and social care groups have pointed out that the discrepancy is likely to pose a challenge to recruitment.
Mark Adams - chief executive of UK social care charity Community Integrated Care - said the change “is not the silver bullet to ‘fix’ this crisis”.
Mr Adams called for proper pay, funding and training, “rather than a focus on short-term tweaks to plaster over the cracks”.
He said, “Whilst we’re pleased to see the Government finally concede that care workers play a skilled role in society, the reality is, for most providers, this change will have little or no effect.”
Mr Adams said the “vast majority” of care workers will not meet the minimum income threshold to qualify for the visa, adding: “If the Government truly want a high-skilled, high wage economy, then salaries have to reflect the professional standards required to deliver quality care, and local authorities must be funded by central Government to pay for this.”
The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) first announced that care workers would be added to the shortage occupation list on December 24, 2021.
The decision came after a recommendation from the Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) that such jobs should be made eligible for the health and care visa and placed on the list, which is designed to help migrants get work visas to fill roles where there are shortages.
In mid-December, the MAC reportedly said that this action was called for “immediately” to mitigate the “severe and increasing difficulties” the sector was facing with recruitment and retention.
Employers can apply to the Home Office to become sponsors and assign a certificate of sponsorship to a worker they have recruited from overseas, who can then apply to come to the UK under the visa.
The Independent Care Group - representing providers in York and North Yorkshire - welcomed the move but said it was already laden down by bureaucracy.
Chairman Mike Padgham said providers are “experiencing lengthy delays in getting the licences needed to recruit staff, which is the last thing we need”. His care home group, Saint Cecilia’s, applied to become a sponsor in late November when senior care staff were on the shortage occupation list and had yet to be approved.
He said, “We need these staff to provide care today and tomorrow, not some time in the future when the bureaucracy is sorted out. The Government needs to streamline this process or we will be no better off.
“This obstacle should never have been put in our way in the first place. But then once a decision had been taken to remove it, we should not have had to wait this long; it was announced on Christmas Eve after all.
“Now we are finding that there are further delays. It is simply not acceptable for a sector that is on its knees already.
“The people who need care and those providing it deserve better than this.”
Mr Padgham said providers that want to take part in the scheme but pay existing staff less than £10.10 an hour would have to raise wages across the board to avoid pay disparities between these employees and new overseas workers.
He added, “If we put our prices up to cope, then as you know local authorities can’t afford it, and they’re not funded adequately by Government anyway, so it’s a vicious circle.”
The temporary measures will be in place for a minimum of 12 months, but Mr Padgham said he believes they must be made permanent to cope with future demand.
Karolina Gerlich - chief executive of the Care Workers’ Charity - said, “We believe care workers should also be added to the skilled worker visa list permanently.”
A Government spokesperson said, “Ahead of the changes coming into force, we’ve started an ambitious package of reform of the sponsorship system and we’re supporting employers new to the system to navigate it.
“We want to see employers make long-term investments in the UK domestic workforce instead of relying on labour from abroad. Our Plan for Jobs is helping people across the country retrain, build new skills and get back into work.
“We are doing everything we can to support the incredibly hardworking care staff, including by investing £462.5 million in workforce recruitment and retention funds, expanding the health and care visa scheme and promoting our Made with Care recruitment campaign.”
Source: Evening Standard
(Link and quotes via original reporting)
Relaxed immigration rules for overseas care workers will have “little or no effect” because most UK employers do not pay these workers enough to qualify for the scheme, Evening Standard reports.
This is the warning from a care charity after new immigration rules came into force on February 15 allowing social care providers to recruit overseas workers to fill the significant number of vacancies that the sector is beset with.
Eligible workers will now be able to apply to come to the UK with their dependants - including partners and children - under the health and care visa, which offers a path to settlement.
To qualify, carers will reportedly need to earn an annual salary minimum of £20,480; equivalent to £10.10 an hour.
This is more than the £9.50 National Living Wage due to come into force in April and social care groups have pointed out that the discrepancy is likely to pose a challenge to recruitment.
Mark Adams - chief executive of UK social care charity Community Integrated Care - said the change “is not the silver bullet to ‘fix’ this crisis”.
Mr Adams called for proper pay, funding and training, “rather than a focus on short-term tweaks to plaster over the cracks”.
He said, “Whilst we’re pleased to see the Government finally concede that care workers play a skilled role in society, the reality is, for most providers, this change will have little or no effect.”
Mr Adams said the “vast majority” of care workers will not meet the minimum income threshold to qualify for the visa, adding: “If the Government truly want a high-skilled, high wage economy, then salaries have to reflect the professional standards required to deliver quality care, and local authorities must be funded by central Government to pay for this.”
The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) first announced that care workers would be added to the shortage occupation list on December 24, 2021.
The decision came after a recommendation from the Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) that such jobs should be made eligible for the health and care visa and placed on the list, which is designed to help migrants get work visas to fill roles where there are shortages.
In mid-December, the MAC reportedly said that this action was called for “immediately” to mitigate the “severe and increasing difficulties” the sector was facing with recruitment and retention.
Employers can apply to the Home Office to become sponsors and assign a certificate of sponsorship to a worker they have recruited from overseas, who can then apply to come to the UK under the visa.
The Independent Care Group - representing providers in York and North Yorkshire - welcomed the move but said it was already laden down by bureaucracy.
Chairman Mike Padgham said providers are “experiencing lengthy delays in getting the licences needed to recruit staff, which is the last thing we need”. His care home group, Saint Cecilia’s, applied to become a sponsor in late November when senior care staff were on the shortage occupation list and had yet to be approved.
He said, “We need these staff to provide care today and tomorrow, not some time in the future when the bureaucracy is sorted out. The Government needs to streamline this process or we will be no better off.
“This obstacle should never have been put in our way in the first place. But then once a decision had been taken to remove it, we should not have had to wait this long; it was announced on Christmas Eve after all.
“Now we are finding that there are further delays. It is simply not acceptable for a sector that is on its knees already.
“The people who need care and those providing it deserve better than this.”
Mr Padgham said providers that want to take part in the scheme but pay existing staff less than £10.10 an hour would have to raise wages across the board to avoid pay disparities between these employees and new overseas workers.
He added, “If we put our prices up to cope, then as you know local authorities can’t afford it, and they’re not funded adequately by Government anyway, so it’s a vicious circle.”
The temporary measures will be in place for a minimum of 12 months, but Mr Padgham said he believes they must be made permanent to cope with future demand.
Karolina Gerlich - chief executive of the Care Workers’ Charity - said, “We believe care workers should also be added to the skilled worker visa list permanently.”
A Government spokesperson said, “Ahead of the changes coming into force, we’ve started an ambitious package of reform of the sponsorship system and we’re supporting employers new to the system to navigate it.
“We want to see employers make long-term investments in the UK domestic workforce instead of relying on labour from abroad. Our Plan for Jobs is helping people across the country retrain, build new skills and get back into work.
“We are doing everything we can to support the incredibly hardworking care staff, including by investing £462.5 million in workforce recruitment and retention funds, expanding the health and care visa scheme and promoting our Made with Care recruitment campaign.”
Source: Evening Standard
(Link and quotes via original reporting)